Genre Clash

or Mutation?

FOK'rs (Friends of Keith'rs) were noted on the...STEPHANIE MILLER SHOW, along with a rumor from above. Un...like the fabled "unexpressed thought".*





* not to make fun of dog killers, only the forum of Tucker's in second video
[and I did not mean to rhyme]
[and for "some people", genre refers to the medium(& mutation) of the mess age.]
[for others...]
[ and back to the future...express]***

*** this is an overpass to the "turn" spike [With the parsing of the great genre in Keith, the rise of the Young Turks, Matthews is the Oddball in my book. Too cute by half, but not these haves.

[Afternoon update, from my Oddball book, aka Edutainment and speculation, from Ed Schultz the President Obama's 5 year "in non-security, discretionary spending" budget freeze: actually the speculation is mine that many things can be on the table as security and many others are not as discretionary. But it may be a Peter, Paul and Robin' hood scenario. AKA a spin on our past presidents. But seriously or rather flippantly, the book is also about false equivalents. Rachel is no Jon Stewart, Olbermann is no Glenn Beck, Matthews is no "fair and balanced", and Ed Schultz is no Rush, though he does get flush at times. It is about the dialogue, even if it is grand sitting at times.]
[And an earlier crack at the table...aka footnotes of pre-ignition.**]

** and this is an achronistic asterisk i.e. just have to make sure that there are three, and to note that the Mutation link and all that follows was based on only seeing the first few minutes of The Daily Show. [Achronistic is timely in a third way as the third asterisk is placed earlier and regards another post. Not this one though. (At least in toto and one sitting.)]
[Parting asterisks of "past presidents" I like Teddy. Oh Bear Man?]

[1-28-11 Update]

Nadir

or Bane or...

Enhanced State of the Union,
Republican Response,
and the Third Way?**

With minimum of rhetoric I have filtered of sorts. Boy, was it hard work! Googling* is not easy. I tried to find "fair and balanced" sources, but these
were the ones I chose to settle on. There is more than irony in the way the searches worked, or is there? Some might call it a conspiracy. But others might wish for a 4th dimension.

* or any search engine depending on the words chosen
(and original intent) as original viewing was CNN but sometimes it is not just me.

** 1-26-11

[1-26-11 Woof! Ratings are now in for the SOTU, and here are two ecumenical references. Rachel Maddow, a "prayer for the free-market" from as Joe Scarborough put it "the Cardinal". Who let the CEO's out! Speaking of "genre" note the connection to CNN. My bad, I can't located any embedded references in by blog to a recent Republican Debate sponsored by CNN, but it may be there somewhere. But this does link to the question of the genre of the networks.]

Your so vane...

whether vain or preemptive pretention [!]?*
And in an attempt to follow up on each, I will work on reading the whether as much as the preemption. 

Speaking of ge oh metric(or me trick) projects. (fn)
{in (fn) redone duncy...}
[Not sure it fits the Right genre or Uber-genre, but George W. Bush's "political capital" crack.]

*your*(12-23-12)

The Billy Club...

needs some explaining.

---
[INSERT UPDATE 2-18-11: << SERIOUSLY these are a serious sortings of views.] >> Note sortings link is important to the explaining of The Billy Club lost in the scuffle.]
---

(original post continued)
It was a reference to the Bill Maher-Elizabeth Hasselbeck feud over humor and politics. aka: rhetoric and intelligence

It also pertains to the King of Rhetoric and the Genre Clash. But in regard to the "Billy Club" it was based on the "Billy Boy" name Elizabeth used, (which I use) to indicate that Beck(Glenn, nor HasselB) is not in the league of Bill Maher let alone the likes of other Bills. Now I have realized that the Billy Club could be easily mistaken as including O'Reilly. It does, but in the likes of not being in the same league as any on the so-called "left". Indeed Bill O'Reilly does make FOX look respectable, considering the field(Comedy News Network). So to be sure, the Billy Club is a fan club not a weapon, but is about the Genre Clash which is more of an evolution(note mutation) than a revolution (actualy Spin Zone).

I will pause to review the above and maybe find more to explain, and in that vain, well actually on a new path(vein or vane) I might not have more to explain, if I am more careful.

But back to the original forum of explaining(The View) and my not always having viewed sources completely (we all cherry pick-but some don't know apples from oranges, and I may be a fruit salad maker by not wanting to clean my kitchen of the tools or fruits* and nuts of the right) here is a countertop** I don't use. But my embedded point of the first asterrisk is my own suggested answer to Bill O'Reilly for why President Obama is hated. "Because of the likes of you, Bill O'Reilly". It even has a sense of balance.

* as often happens the right link is an aftersearch(pun on my link not the Right)
(It is counter intuitive or not a dis of the likes of Lawrence O'Donnell)

** in reference to link or lede into "so you don't have to" sometimes we must. And I am sure that Beth Beck(aka Elizabeth HasselB) would turn up her nose if I segue from Kings(Tut) to Queen Tit for Tat, "that perhaps others would want to call" her.

[Speaking of salads and segues(see comment 1)or vain(vein or vane) attempts:Current TV (any relation to Shock Jocks or anti-Pop Culture)
CNN Comedy News Network
ABC Anti-Billy Club ***
And what about that Calm Cast or America on Hypocrisy?]
*** maybe more later
[Well actually I was thinking about the organizational structure of the ABC: the Anti-Billy Club. Bill Maher would be the what? Only the original Billy maybe. Heck this is metaphorical anyway. Maybe ASZ would work. Anti-Spin Zone? Too court jestery but maybe a hint at the structure. So structure aside it is the thought that counts.(Though some are free to flow down D'Nile or the slippery slope.) The Try Angle of ABC's aside, it might be too fruitless. But recognizing some of the negativity in the words adn sybolism is a bit like the expectations of Representative Steve King. Thankfully he is a Represenative that may obviate the label of leadership. The pulling back he expects of our President, is the other end of this candle burning on both ends. I won't drag philosphies or ideologies in at this point, only the word play or lack of efficiency in its utilizations. The Anti-Billy Club is a sentiment that is not about Bill Maher or Bill O'Reilly(Or a reflection on the Bill of Rights, but justly might be.) It is about the club of association, a tool that some wield as a weapon or simply run with scissors when a spoon may do.]

[Please note my equal opportunity jest you'ring, not to leave CBS out or dis Comcast or Huffington let alone Salon. There will always be critics or those that have opinions on the intentions of people or organizations. But I am hinting at the Calm Cast sentiment of the MSNBC/Comcast merger along with the Olbermann departure and the Huffington some say sell out to AOL. Hence the America On Hyposcisy, I just had to fit in an H for the sake of merger. Not to pull back, or Palin drone.]

PC of Mini-Me

Press conference, that is!(*)
Presidential press conference on Syria Us and Con Gress.
Not to Maddow(2) or that's the ticket, but a diplomacy of preemption and word wars, not a red line of nuance.

* * * Labels PC(pre-conference) * * *
Foreign Policy
Diplomacy
Globalization
Obama Doctrine

(*) heading triggered by Hardball's Chris Matthews
No Grand Bargain nor Mini-Morph but Share 'n Angle

      ( *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *)      
First Question: Syria / Game Changer
2nd?Q: Bengazi B.S. Headline Generator
Self-Radicalizing?  Old Hats Diehard?
Mark (twain) Paul Jones?
           *   *   *   *   *   *   *
Guantanamo Dilemma and the Taliban Party.
Domestic Justice Exceptionalism and Community Divergence.
Chicken Little   State Rights
               *        *        *
(asterisk bracketed to sequester other asterisks as genre shifts)
(9*'s): press conference begins
(7*'s): genre or nuance shift [?] ! [(**)]

                  *          *(1)
[Self Radicalization and Boot Straps(3)]
(1) label added inserted "and" 
(2) Maddow
(1): anachronistically (2 too)
(2): a, B(b),C(c)
(b.s.): A, B(b), C(c)
(3) A, B(b), C(c), D!
[In time for Now!(Ann-Marie Slaughter/Tango) THE THIN RED LINE! Self Radicalization links inserted]
[PCR? Published Chemical Reaction? See Now with Alex Wagner.]
[(B S) Boot Straps (FP1) ]

[(**) all links this line inserted post-4Fp's]
[Update: Top-line links inserted and font change 5-3-13]

Perspectivism

A preemptive thought intruded before I could go further. Where are the women?  I will leave that for another time.
So it is with only slight further ado, that I note the heading, as the only context for the mentioning** of a few blogs. 

Contrary Brin
Pax On Both Houses

From Gender to Genre:
Darwins-god
A forth perspective.*

The first two especially, respect style and perspectivism, not to mention** subject matter. 
The third is a stretch on a few counts*, let alone complexity. A runner-up for 4th might be:

*still in processing

1-6-15
[Pardon the spacing anomalies.]
Re:runner-ups. 
^*^ 3rd and 4th anachronism.** Counter-popperism? 
** asteri(s)cal anachronism ^context~mentioning^
(s) type-O?/ asterical(spell check in-operable[!]?)
[R.I.P. Not a shot at irony[!], police labor strife*** works where justice fails?
*** not a strike @ hard work, they do. [!](?) 

Science Fiction Writers

Enrolled in the War on Terror and blamed for the War on Terror. The usefullness of these writers presumably is their value in being imaginative and having some ability to influence the future. But to me the value is in their words and ones ability to interpret them, much as this blog. And here. And here. Just a few on intelligence.

But here I reference the "scale of justice" and now find in my mailbox The Scales of Justice. Coincidence? There are connections that make such more likely, like following what is going on and seeing similar consequences. Here was the ealiest reference to consequences. Here is the Search Blog for "consequences".

Speaking of "the latter" and looking back to the choice of words I realize my last post was a run on.

Earlier,[*] on the difference in liberal and conservative views. the good versus the evil nature of man and the purpose of government, that of protecting from the latter, the latter[**] has evolved to the point of doing no good.

[*] new link inserted here
[**] the latter evolved: and the second latter was the "purpose of government", the immediately prior latter was "conservative views".

OK, this "Speaking of" was out of the blue or a tangent but back to the choice of words and the latter (Oh that is where it was from) the latter link in my first sentence above on who is "blamed for" consequences. Asimov was a favorite writer of mine at an early age, but his science fact was as valuable as his fiction, but "The Foundation" series was not on my reading list, but the word "Foundation" is in the dictionary (Search Blog) and obviously in those of other languages and there is a connection when you go there and consequences when you don't as Rumsfeld confessed if you will do your own Contol F when you get there.

If you don't go there here is the segment.

On patriotism, we must have follow through. Do not ban flag burning or require the pledge of allegiance, but expect respect for and stand up for the principles "for which it stands". Without "liberty and justice for all" we can hardly be "indivisible". As Bush so eloquently said in his September 20th address to congress: "We are in a fight for our principles, and our first responsibility is to live by them." Is it any indication to the contrary that on the very day Bush declared this a "war" the Secretary of Defense confessed that he had yet to consult a dictionary to define war?

Meanwhile: the word foundation is in the dictionary too, and it is not just the blame but a needed part to any stucture.

[10:05 AM The Foundation Series(Control Find "History") by Isaac Asimov may be more valuable in predicting our future than it's contribution to terror. However it is plane that Bush has made great contributions to Al-Qaeda: The Base ]

[I must note 10:26 AM that I had not read till just moments ago, the second link above> While I cannot now find a link that dismissed it, I find it touched on more relevant matters than the first link, many of which I have touched on above and before. From it:

One can't blame Asimov for fuelling the swollen fantasies of the murderous. It is the last thing this committed pacifist ("violence is the last refuge of the incompetent") would have wanted. He may not be the only famous sci-fi author to have been taken up by lunatics, anyway. Killer cultist Charles Manson's favourite book is said to have been Stranger in a Strange Land, written by Asimov's rival for the imaginative future Robert Heinlein.

if that is not a prediction that came true, I don't know what is. But there is a the law of cause and effect, which is may connect to the sentence which followed:

More generally, the space opera sub-genre of science fiction offers the possibility of a massive expansion of self-mythologising will-to-power.

... and so now we have the request for help from writers? By whom and for whom?]

Random Points

[POST 2-8-11]

Running from Labels?
Who knows what whom didn't?
Belly Up to the Table.
Trust(HBO) but verify.
Redistribution of Wealth
Redistribution of Yikes
Redistribution of Genre
Less than random thought: What is Sarah Palin running for?
November 2011: The New Adventures of Regis and the Old Larry King? Queen of Truth and Balance. A cornerstone: "We should not stand for that, or with that or by that." FYIS: For Your Information Sarah - here are for whom knows started it.
BTW: My language is the victim to the hood of refudiation here. i.e. close enough for government work?
[Note: bottom link will always indicate previous post]

A generous dia-Gnosis.

Not to mention Chaos Theory:

Or parallel evolution:

and other yikes*.

*from link "evolution":[Clash of the Titans(and other narratives) Yikes! ]

Note: Under Clash "or Mutation" and "Yatze" and other Transformers Megan of Fox. Not that I have that high hopes for Current TV. But seriously: The Genre Clash or Mutation does refer to my expectations that something would evolve out of the blue.
[rather than pop culture and love it or leave it**]

** not to have too embedded cultural points, but the Citizens United and Papers Please(or Re:birthers) is lost somewhere.(under "morphology")Have!

Note: compare and contrast comment and Beck is not in the Billy Club(see end of ** here) is not the half of it.

Sabbatical:

A word used several times and several ways,
but in this I mean a change of fields.
Or PAUSE to adjust format and deal with other matters.

Including but not limited too:
Genre Clash

[CLICK PAUSE FOR CON TEXT (i.e. full month*)]
[Still in flux. Note top three.**]
[Feb Archive / Jan Archive UPDATES]
2-3-11
(* 2-4-11: i.e. added and other adjustments)
(** links adjusted)
[2-7-11 SUPER BOWL POST MOVED]
[[SUPER BOWL POST]
[2-7-11 Clash of the Titans]]
[Obtuse Comment]

Voodoo Revisited.

The architect of Reaganomics admits GOP fallacy.
Rob Zombie comes to mind*, to feed the rich.

* Rob Zombie (a director of horror genre)
David Stockman (Reagan's Director of Management and Budget)

[Ribble: a economic horror script]
[8-6-10 ribble label added, though already leaked]

Econ #$% ? (^)

Peter Paul and Pocket?
Red and Black and Grey all over.

Fiscal Krugman ? [!]




[Lede or * Ship?]


* bottoms up?
Later , V for Victim , A little knowledge is dangerous


a. The Bully..., c. Cost of Course, d. Lessons of War, EH? H. Post Newtonian Economics, j.It turns out... , k. The Be All and End All? , l. Hi Ate Us , m. Presidential SOTU , n. Coin-age of the day. o. Simon says 2 point or...? , p. Politics is local?


To Be Arranged , b.  hmmm? , c. Loose Lips and Sinking Metaphors , d. Blog-Oi-Ya-Bleep., eh? , F. Rat Races Van Mices? , G. The LESS THAN pentagonal file: , h. No0000![!]? (/\/) , i, , J? K!CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)


a. Fair and Balanced..., b. Genre Clash


Econ 101, 10, 1, L


Titanic Berg ?
QCON: TruthOut  (x)
Trick Question of the Day? (y)
FORGOTTEN HUMANITY!   (~)


(^) naut expletive
nor necessarily de-cap aster risks.
Econ 345?(6) or (lb. buck per cent?up)
OW: Chart ? ... math, English, Platonics~ Art
Grubergate: the knows under the elephants hump?(nose camel straw broke)
G O P : Governing Our Problem
 WON: War on Nuance

Dancing &Co

Dancing and Bernstein*** and Simon Says.
Is Roger Simon concidering a genre change?
Or has he always been so sharp? 
Unlike?(Wall Street Joe?)[Or is it Mourning Joe?]


9-28-12  Follow-up :  Sharp Unlike.
Roger Simon's parody of a mockery on the campaign trail **.  (Or cam pain?*)
Wall Street Journal agrees it is the stupid congress. 

*Tommy Christopher digs deeper. 'zzzzzzzz'
(Iron knee of sat ire read it completely.) 

**  (b.s. ). satire mockery
*** can Ohioans do math or what [!] ?
(I know percentage does not equal vote but I am employing mythmatic.  Chances of Romney win in Ohio below 4%. Yet to compare maps or 538.)   

[Bottomline:  It is not the prophets or Simon says corporate capitalizers, but it may be the Peter Paul and Mary principle.  No, just the Peter principle and robbing Paul to pay Peter.  A bird in the hand is worth not having two bushes or an etch-a-sketch Bush is more dangerous when they think they will do one^ better.] 

^ not to (fn) butt... 

Genre Issues

Has a niche reached the end of its road ?

On the Q. T.?

Rather than M-bed or Genre-Monger or work my geometrics,
here is a spin-off** from other ramblings, as BS has evolved. [FP1]

(1) Quadrilateral Thoughts.***
(2) (b.s.) "social+media": A, b, c, D, e, F, g, h. (a, d, f?)  
(3) "Boston + Strong"
(4) "Labelism" (AtF?)* A, B, C, D, E, F ( a, e, f )
*(b.s.)@(2) was A through H (ah ha?) [$HA?]
** Jabber Walkie?

***(insert)  4-29-13 Earlier Q.T.[but seriously! (O-W)]

Segue/Sabbatical

Steel on Wheels Dylan Ratigan.
Rahm Rhetoric on going to waste.
Hardball Politics of them and us.
I will leave this post with this and rest as to reads for further thumbing.

The Steel on Wheels and Hardball are two MSNBC linguistic references(to be links) to a Genre Clash or Segue Slash between disciplines*. Ratigan and Business for the People, and Matthews and Political Partisan strategies of conflict.

* not to mention Apostles and Ledership

[YES! as I recall. Well I may have made to much of a leap here but, I think that Obama should be making the most of the Wiscsonsin Waterloo for the Republican Strategy.

S-word of Damocles

The Last Word?*
Jared Bernstein: The Sequester. 
Un-Meta Glom ?
The Warren Wing?
Justice Leon

Re: Right Mindwringing?
Not.

[*The Sequester has been partially alleviated...
Italics & Note and links  to The Last Word inserted 12-18-13]

Note:  There must be a genre for analogue evolution [!] Might be under the rubric of Hegelian objectivism[!] Or Manichean Subjectivism ?   The Vote is the Sword.  The Sequester is the S-Word.
Re: HA?[!]

[x, y, z ? (ow)]

Schiller, Schelling, Shell Lacking and Schopenhauer*?

(1864-1917) Humanism, How is "exactness" possible*?
(1775-1854) Transcendental Idealism
Newtonian venn?**

* I will do little more than indicate Schopenhauer's relation to Hegel under Runes, let alone Schlick.(The Construction of Theories)
** Hobbes Squaring the Circle pre-Newton/Liebniz.

Ribble? re: nacre?
Hint?

12-27-13 Hobbes (b.s.)^  and Schlick(wiki) links inserted.

^ A(2) ? genre fishing ? ! ?

Pre-Mod L? (1588-1679)(1642-1727)(1646-1716)  So there was some overlap. Hobbes was mocked for trying to square the circle pre-calculus or pre-hyperbolic geometry. ? ! (lost roots ! ? [a, b, c ] ) (spoiler alert => OW do not scroll)

Mis-Infotainment Tonight

Well, last night.

Since it is likely that the above link will be pulled* from the internet, this proves there is a conspiracy of the liberal media.

Nevertheless, I will comment on Bill O'Reilly's interview of Dennis Miller, comedian.
Dennis Miller makes Bill O'Reilly look...like a "fair and balanced" interviewer. Dennis Miller makes Jonathan Swift look...like a satirist.
I could go on, but it was all about Dennis Miller and... hate and... lame at that. Except for one laugh: "I don't know why people say things out loud sometimes. I think maybe..."

Speaking of lame: Rachel Maddow is spoofed on SNL. I don't know if it is just me, the characters or the writers, but it was not so funny. Maybe it is hard to spoof someone who is funny and doing a good job, without needing to do an even better job. Burris may even fall into that category, but it could be just in comparison toBlog-oy-ya-bleep.

For more fun'n edifying:
*** ***
[CORRECTION: Poor transition!]
*** ***

FOR ACTUAL Fun'n Edifying:
The Stephanie Miller Show
The Randi Rhodes Show

* this link was emailed with the urgency that it was going to be pulled from the internet because Democrats did not want the truth out there. It is not.
[For the irony challenged, I flip-flop between facts and "frame of reference"** rather than straight satire. So I will con descend to flip the con text: It is not at this point pulled or the truth.]

** apparently the genre of the right, not to mention the Miller's...

LOCAL RADIO and Real Infotainment.(Time Stamp 9:10 AM)
And National Fun'n Edifying:
The Daily Show
The Colbert Report(TS 9:40 AM)

And for real "fair and balanced" see Huffington Post though not really radio or TV. But something must be "read into" that by Bill Kristol: The reason conservatives had food is that they provided it, which was nice for Will to host Obama, while the "liberals" were invited by Obama and he was just being conservative or not letting you read something into that also.

Breaking or

Peripatetic Justice and Ledership let alone
an achronism ?

This is a ramble on the Wave, aka the 4th Estate as well as a hint for a Ribble. No pun on Reliable Sources but I could have more reliable spelling but not an achronism.

I won't mess with the mutliple bottom lines* but it is about change and finding a silver lining. Changing my procedures will be job one, but as for this content note the bold italics. This is a preemptive note, before I take the time to more fully process the SOTU.

Foot note: fourwords for the two word culture - bane or con text

* last links added: period/pause

[Woof! Ratings are now in for the SOTU, and here are two ecumenical references. Rachel Maddow, a "prayer for the free-market" from as Joe Scarborough put it "the Cardinal". Who let the CEO's out! Speaking of "genre" note the connection to CNN.]